Penn State

Consortium forSocial Movements and Education
Research and Practice

Adult Education Policy Between Utopia and Fatalism: A Review Essay of Policy-related Literature

Adult Education Policy Between Utopia and Fatalism: A Review Essay of Policy-related Literature

Ursula Giere
1994
1994

Abstract

For the purpose of this review essay on international policy-related English language literature on adult education from the 2970s, 298Os, and 299Os, the following models of recent adult education policy options, aiming at social change and redistribution of power under varying conjunctures,have been constructed from the literature available: the revolutionary/transformationalmodel, the humanist model, the rationalist economic model, the post-industrial society model, the new social movement model, and the welfare state model. These models are not exclusive-there may be others-nor are they to be forced into a chronological order. However, they may occur in an interconnected aswellasinadialecticsequence. Choiceorapplication of any or a combination of these models have not brought about redistribution of knowledge or power. Whatever the philosophy, individualist or collective; whatever the approach, selective or campaign; whatever the economy, free market or centrally controlled; whatever the political system, capitalist or socialist; whatever the geographical region, developing or industrialized; indeed, whatever the conditions, the forces resisting an enduring redistributive effect seem to have capacities f o reestablish or even reinforce hierarchies challenged by attempts at transformation.

Abstract

For the purpose of this review essay on international policy-related English language literature on adult education from the 2970s, 298Os, and 299Os, the following models of recent adult education policy options, aiming at social change and redistribution of power under varying conjunctures,have been constructed from the literature available: the revolutionary/transformationalmodel, the humanist model, the rationalist economic model, the post-industrial society model, the new social movement model, and the welfare state model. These models are not exclusive-there may be others-nor are they to be forced into a chronological order. However, they may occur in an interconnected aswellasinadialecticsequence. Choiceorapplication of any or a combination of these models have not brought about redistribution of knowledge or power. Whatever the philosophy, individualist or collective; whatever the approach, selective or campaign; whatever the economy, free market or centrally controlled; whatever the political system, capitalist or socialist; whatever the geographical region, developing or industrialized; indeed, whatever the conditions, the forces resisting an enduring redistributive effect seem to have capacities f o reestablish or even reinforce hierarchies challenged by attempts at transformation.

Social Movements

Keywords

Globalization, Nonformal Education, Pedagogy, Policy

Theme

Popular Education; Adult Education; and Social Movement Learning